<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Raiders to keep Seymour even if he never plays</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justblogbaby.com/2009/09/10/raiders-to-keep-seymour-even-if-he-never-plays/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justblogbaby.com/2009/09/10/raiders-to-keep-seymour-even-if-he-never-plays/</link>
	<description>An Oakland Raiders Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 16:12:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slam</title>
		<link>http://justblogbaby.com/2009/09/10/raiders-to-keep-seymour-even-if-he-never-plays/comment-page-1/#comment-968</link>
		<dc:creator>Slam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justblogbaby.com/?p=2388#comment-968</guid>
		<description>I wonder if Seymour is banging on Al for a big fat extension, like the one Meangello Hall got, or is demanding that the Raiders don&#039;t franchise him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Seymour is banging on Al for a big fat extension, like the one Meangello Hall got, or is demanding that the Raiders don&#8217;t franchise him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 23/29 queries in 0.078 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 285/314 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: justblogbaby.com @ 2013-05-24 20:46:58 by W3 Total Cache -->