Oakland Needs More Consistency Out of Richard Seymour in 2010


I worked for the Patriots from 2005-2008, right after Richard Seymour signed his big contract. In New England, we all knew there were two versions of Seymour. The Seymour who played with a chip on his shoulder and the one who just went through the motions.

Let me give you an example.

Before the 2007 AFC Championship Game versus San Diego, Chargers C Nick Hardwick called out Seymour, suggesting he was soft. Seymour didn’t take kindly to those comments.

During the pregame activities,  Seymour was barking at the Charger players and pumping up his teammates. That isn’t a usual scene for the normally laid back Seymour.

Once the game started, Seymour dominated from start to finish. He was a constant disruption and lived in San Diego’s backfield. Officially, Seymour only registered three tackles on the stat sheet but anyone who watched that game knows the havoc he caused for the Chargers offense.

Now I take you back to Seymour’s first game with the Raiders, once again against Hardwick and the Chargers. Seymour wasn’t happy about being traded and wanted to prove to the Patriots that he was still a great player.

The result? Another dominating performance with six tackles and two sacks.

The reason the Pats let Seymour go is because he didn’t play like this all the time and Oakland fans saw some examples of that last season. At times, Seymour played like a man possessed but in other games he was non-existent.

That kind of inconsistency is the reason Bill Belichick and Co. didn’t want to give Seymour another huge contract. 

The Raiders brought Seymour in to help them sure up their run defense. If you want to be literal, Seymour’s presence helped.

Oakland allowed 155.5 yards per game on the ground in 2009, down from 159.7 the previous year. That’s probably not the kind of improvement the Raiders had in mind when they traded a first-round pick for Seymour.

The Raiders have a chance to field a strong defense in 2010 but they need someone to take charge and be a leader. That’s why Al Davis traded for Seymour and is paying him over $12 million this year.

Seymour is the one with three Super Bowl rings. He knows what it’s like to be in big games. 

While he may not be brash or give a lot of pre-game pep talks, it’s time for Seymour to take on a bigger role and lead by example. That means playing at 100 percent, every game, every down.

Richard Seymour can still be one of the NFL’s premier defensive linemen. Considering he’s playing for a new long-term contract, my guess is that’s the Seymour we will see in Oakland this season.

Next Raiders Game View full schedule »
Thursday, Aug 2828 Aug7:00Seattle SeahawksBuy Tickets
Dick's Sporting Goods presents "Hell Week":

Tags: Oakland Raiders Richard Seymour

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Oakland Needs More Consistency Out of Richard Seymour in 2010 | Just Blog Baby | An Oakland Raiders Blog -- Topsy.com

  • Madra0dd0g

    Seymour is another example of why the NFL players get too much money. Stop the bonuses and pay these guys based on performance only. Yes, they should have a better injury clause and retirement situation but channel most of the money back to the fans in the way of better stadiums and lower ticket prices!

  • Slam

    He’s another Darrell Russell/Chester McGlocklin underachiever…mediocre last year, blew-off all offseason OTA’s, then signs a $12 million contract.

    NFL plyers make too much money. Just like the NBA. That’s why there will be a big strike.

  • Thomas Casale

    I agree with both of you guys. If you look at Seymour’s on-field performance the last five years, the fact that he is making over $12 million this season is comical. But like I said, now that he is playing for a long-term contract, you will see the best he has to offer. After that? Good luck.

  • Phil

    Seymours numbers wern’t that great in the sack department last year, but he freed up other players to make sacks. Raiders were amoung the sack leaders last year in the NFL. Seymours did have an impact on the Raiders defense last year, and if you can’t see that, you know very little about the game or just blind.

  • David M Rolle

    This is why the Raiders drafted Lamarr Houston.

  • Thomas Casale

    Phil,
    He had impact in some games but was non-existent in others. I saw every play of every Raider game last year and every play from 2005-2007 when Seymour played for the Pats. The guy doesn’t play at full speed all the time. I’m sorry but anyone who has followed Seymour knows that. It’s a fact. That’s why he’s not in New England anymore.

  • Lurker88

    I agree he underachieves. It looks like Belichick and company knew what they were doing when they chose Wilfork over Seymour. Unfortunately Davis’ boys didn’t do their homework again or they would have assessed that before trading for him. Reminds me of the trade for D.Hall, thinking him a shutdown press corner he never was.

  • http://www.josh.com Josh

    Why would he need to be more consistent when last years performance got him 12MILLION?! I agree he can be a force like in game 1 against the Chargers. They need to find a way to motivate him which does not include more money.

  • jimkarrera

    Check out this Novel that says hurricane katrina was a terrorist attack. Just google Katrina Nights. Or go to http://hurricanekatrinakaif.com