<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Just Blog Baby &#187; Fantasy Football</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justblogbaby.com/tag/fantasy-football/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justblogbaby.com</link>
	<description>An Oakland Raiders Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:36:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Oakland Raiders: A Fantasy Football Conundrum</title>
		<link>http://justblogbaby.com/2013/05/05/the-oakland-raiders-a-fantasy-football-conundrum/</link>
		<comments>http://justblogbaby.com/2013/05/05/the-oakland-raiders-a-fantasy-football-conundrum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 19:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Ling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fantasy Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland Raiders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justblogbaby.com/?p=9876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Fantasy football has become more popular than ever. And why shouldn&#8217;t it be? Whoever had the idea of sitting around with your boys, kicking back some brews, and watching football competitively should be given a medal! But where do the Oakland Raiders fit into a bro&#8217;s fantasy game? Unfortunately they don&#8217;t. The 2013 Oakland Raiders [...]</p><p><a href="http://justblogbaby.com/2013/05/05/the-oakland-raiders-a-fantasy-football-conundrum/">The Oakland Raiders: A Fantasy Football Conundrum</a> - <a href="http://justblogbaby.com">Just Blog Baby</a> - <a href="http://justblogbaby.com">Just Blog Baby - An Oakland Raiders Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/zuVsLR_2GX0?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
<p>Fantasy football has become more popular than ever. And why shouldn&#8217;t it be? Whoever had the idea of sitting around with your boys, kicking back some brews, and watching football <em>competitively </em>should be given a medal!</p>
<p>But where do the Oakland Raiders fit into a bro&#8217;s fantasy game? Unfortunately they don&#8217;t. The 2013 Oakland Raiders are a team filled with potential all across the board. Sorry to all the people who keep echoing that Oakland has a depleted roster that is filled with holes. But the truth is, GM Reggie McKenzie, filled in a good portion of those weak spots. Between free agency and the draft, Oakland isn&#8217;t too shabby on paper.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the good news for Raider&#8217;s fans. The bad news is, fantasy football is not about potential. Stats are all that counts in the fantasy world, and nobody wearing the silver and black can really step up as a standout fantasy superstar. As of right now most of the roster is rather unproven.  However, some Raiders can fit into one&#8217;s squad.</p>
<p><strong>Darren McFadden</strong> -Due to injury and lack of productivity in general, McFadden, will most likely drop in fantasy drafts. This is good news! With a power running scheme back in town McFadden could have a breakout season. So long as he stays healthy (what are the chances he goes down again) I would rank McFadden as high as the number two back on a fantasy team.</p>
<p><strong>Denarius Moore/ Jacoby Ford &#8211; </strong>These are the only two receivers in Oakland worth gambling on. Because of the ever so frequent injuries in Oakland the receivers are not very consistent. But it never hurts to have potential riding the bench. If Moore or Ford play big in weeks one and two, they might be worth a start in week three. Jacoby Ford can also come in handy in leagues that reward points for special teams scores.</p>
<div id="attachment_9877" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/28/files/2013/05/6947350.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9877" title="NFL: Oakland Raiders at Baltimore Ravens" src="http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/28/files/2013/05/6947350-300x454.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="454" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nov 11, 2012; Baltimore, MD, USA; Oakland Raiders receiver Denarius Moore (17) is defended by Baltimore Ravens linebacker Dannell Ellerbe (59) at M</p></div>
<p>Despite all the love and fanfare for Rod Streater, I really don&#8217;t see number 80 being a huge part of the team in 2013. The kid stepped up and filled in when he needed to, but all I see is an alright possession receiver similar to Derek Hagan. Stay away from him as I predict him disappearing (prove me wrong Streater, I&#8217;d love to see you become a superstar).</p>
<p><strong>Sebastian Janikowski &#8211; </strong>Always a great secret weapon! Many leagues reward more points for 50-plus yard kicks. Jano just happens to kick those in almost as much as he gets in trouble at the strip club.</p>
<p><strong>Oakland Raiders Defense &#8211; </strong>Fantasy defenses make the most points from creating turnovers. Something I believe D.J. Hayden will excel at under the tutelage of Tracy Porter. Both corners have great ball skills, and will be helped by a rejuvenated linebacking corp. Keep this defense on the bench until they prove themselves.</p>
<p>Wish I could say more about the Raiders here. Flynn, Pryor, and Wilson are all to iffy to even take as a bench players. The tight ends are a free for all that anybody could win. Seriously they should take open tryouts for tight end, its bad.</p>
<p>Comment who you think has fantasy potential!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justblogbaby.com/2013/05/05/the-oakland-raiders-a-fantasy-football-conundrum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Darren McFadden Fantasy Debate</title>
		<link>http://justblogbaby.com/2012/06/24/the-darren-mcfadden-fantasy-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://justblogbaby.com/2012/06/24/the-darren-mcfadden-fantasy-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Shellcroft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Darren McFadden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Peterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arian Foster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cedric Benson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drew Brees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Knapp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marshawn Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Forte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maurice Jones-Drew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Goodson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan Jones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justblogbaby.com/?p=7753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For those of you who do not engage in the porn of the sports world that is fantasy football I’d suggest moving along to other more engaging topics today such as celebrating Lionel Richie’s belated birthday or searching Octomom videos. The rest of you, follow me, we’re going to take on the dicey subject of [...]</p><p><a href="http://justblogbaby.com/2012/06/24/the-darren-mcfadden-fantasy-debate/">The Darren McFadden Fantasy Debate</a> - <a href="http://justblogbaby.com">Just Blog Baby</a> - <a href="http://justblogbaby.com">Just Blog Baby - An Oakland Raiders Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_7754" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 465px"><a href="http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/28/files/2012/06/5610060.jpg"><img class=" wp-image-7754 " title="NFL: Oakland Raiders at Houston Texans" src="http://cdn.fansided.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/28/files/2012/06/5610060.jpg" alt="" width="455" height="302" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Brett Davis-US PRESSWIRE</p></div>
<p>For those of you who do not engage in the porn of the sports world that is fantasy football I’d suggest moving along to other more engaging topics today such as celebrating Lionel Richie’s belated birthday or searching Octomom videos. The rest of you, follow me, we’re going to take on the dicey subject of debating Darren McFadden’s fantasy value.</p>
<p>Now there really shouldn’t be any debate about this one. <strong>Darren McFadden</strong> is a top 5 fantasy stud that, obviously, were it not for health reasons would be in the top pick conversation. He is the quintessential fantasy running back racking up points in multitude of ways as a runner and a receiver…basically you name it and Run DMC does it. Most important of all is he finds the end zone. Anybody that had McFadden for the first half of last season was likely contending until disaster struck.</p>
<p>Of course if you were really proactive you didn’t sweat McFadden’s health issues because if you were hip to the game you went out and grabbed <strong>Michael Bush</strong> too. In my league I missed out on McFadden but landed Bush. For the first half of the season he sat on my bench but once McFadden went down I rode Bush and <strong>Marshawn Lynch</strong> to the title game…which I eventually lost no thanks to <strong>Drew Brees’</strong> pursuit of history. But we’re getting off course here.</p>
<p>So here we are again. It’s June and your fantasy draft is a month or two away. By now you’ve already pegged a few sleepers, guys ready to breakout and you’ve also got your list of wildcards.</p>
<p>At the top of the wildcard list is McFadden. Unlike other rolls of the dice like <strong>Chris Johnson</strong> last year, there is no concern over McFadden’s ability to produce. Even in games when he doesn’t eclipse the golden 100-yard rushing barrier McFadden is still getting you at least 100 total yards. Johnson, on the other hand, just didn’t produce – at all.</p>
<p>For McFadden’s value to be so closely tied to his health is frightening. If he’s there and anyone you valued ahead of him is gone you’ve got to take McFadden. He’s a gamble but not the <strong>Peyton Manning</strong> type of gamble. Quiet as kept Manning is the biggest fantasy gamble this year and anyone taking him in the first round is really spinning the wheel. No telling how productive Manning will be or if he can even take a hot.</p>
<p>What confounds the McFadden dilemma is there is no insurance policy this time around. He’s not being backed by Bush any longer and there is no reason to think that <strong>Taiwan Jones</strong>, <strong>Mike Goodson</strong> or even <a href="http://justblogbaby.com/?p=7737" target="_blank"><strong>Cedric Benson</strong> should he join the ranks </a>can crank out Bush type numbers.</p>
<p>So the reality is this season you’re simply twisting in the wind with McFadden. Naturally every fantasy running back needs a backup plan. With injuries, bye weeks, bad matchups, etc. However with a healthy McFadden all you need to worry about is the bye. There is no such thing as a bad matchup for Run DMC. Ask the Jets and their supposed top notch run defense about that.</p>
<p>In short, McFadden is a fantasy stud that really shouldn’t last past the first 5 picks of any fantasy draft based on talent alone. Then there is all the uncertainty surrounding some of the other top backs around the league. Contract situations are making the likes of <strong>Matt Forte</strong>, <strong>Maurice Jones-Drew</strong> and <strong>Ray Rice</strong> a little less attractive in the fantasy market. <strong>Adrian Peterson’s</strong> health has taken him out of the conversation and top back <strong>Arian Foster</strong> has a new deal which, in recent years, has been a little like the Madden curse when it comes to top producing fantasy running backs.</p>
<p>Aside from his injury issues the other gamble with McFadden is the zone scheme <strong>Greg Knapp</strong> is installing. During the Raiders offseason program McFadden was singing the praises of the new scheme. But everything looks good when you’re not hitting in May. Then again, with McFadden’s talent he should be able to produce in any system. The problem is there is no system that guarantees his health.</p>
<p>What fantasy value do you give McFadden?</p>
Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justblogbaby.com/2012/06/24/the-darren-mcfadden-fantasy-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 31/40 queries in 0.056 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 505/591 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: justblogbaby.com @ 2013-05-23 22:50:23 by W3 Total Cache -->