Oakland Raiders 75-man Roster Breakdown: Safe/On The Bubble

Dec 24, 2015; Oakland, CA, USA; Oakland Raiders defensive end Khalil Mack (52) celebrates after a safety against the San Diego Chargers during an NFL football game at O.co Coliseum. The Raiders defeated the Chargers 23-20 in overtime. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports
Dec 24, 2015; Oakland, CA, USA; Oakland Raiders defensive end Khalil Mack (52) celebrates after a safety against the San Diego Chargers during an NFL football game at O.co Coliseum. The Raiders defeated the Chargers 23-20 in overtime. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
7 of 7
Next

Summary

Nov 15, 2015; Oakland, CA, USA; Oakland Raiders head coach Jack Del Rio reacts after no penalty was called against the Minnesota Vikings on a pass play in the third quarter at O.co Coliseum. The Vikings defeated the Raiders 30-14. Mandatory Credit: Cary Edmondson-USA TODAY Sports
Nov 15, 2015; Oakland, CA, USA; Oakland Raiders head coach Jack Del Rio reacts after no penalty was called against the Minnesota Vikings on a pass play in the third quarter at O.co Coliseum. The Vikings defeated the Raiders 30-14. Mandatory Credit: Cary Edmondson-USA TODAY Sports /
  • 31 locks
  • 11 comfortable
  • 10 middle-ground
  • 12 on the bubble
  • 11 gone

Outside of the 31 locks — which is a good sign to have so many players set — it’s a balanced list. The other four tiers are within two total players of one another, and there were no edits done to make that happen.

With the roster currently at 75 players, that means 22 will have to be released. With 12 “on the bubble” and 11 “gone”, that’s 23. So if the team poached completely from those lists, I don’t think any fans would have a problem with any of those players being let go.

But there may be some players from the middle-ground, or possibly even the comfortable tier, released. So it’ll be interesting to see how this list differs from the cuts that are eventually made.

Of course, this is completely subjective, so let us know where you disagree.